With the increased use of social media, it is imperative attorneys utilize those services to ensure a web presence. Facebook and Twitter are of course, integral to a firm's web presence but more importantly a web presence on search engines is a necessity. There are several well-known search engines but lesser services where the client is able to further evaluate potential attorneys more closely are popping up. Thumbtack is just one that comes to mind. It is a service wherein a potential client can search a specific location, specific area of law and search through numerous profiles of potential attorneys for their review.
I have utilized many avenues to display my services, but potential clients must be mindful of the skill of the attorney in the courtroom NOT their advertising prowess. It is irrelevant to an attorney's skill level if they have the number one position on a search engine all that says is that (a) they are either great at marketing and Search Engine Optimization (SEO) or (b) they have hired someone who is. It says nothing about their abilities as an attorney. Yes placement helps with potential client's abilities to research, but the better mode is to compare and then ask around for personal references. You can check out my thoughts on "Who To Hire" on my website. That article will give you many decision making ideas when you begin your research for your next DUI attorney. If you ever have questions about a DUI arrest, call Nate Webb at (425) 398-4323 for your always free consultation.
Showing posts with label avoid a DUI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label avoid a DUI. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Friday, February 14, 2014
With this Valentine's day and three-day President's Day weekend come DUI arrests...how can you avoid one?
While President's Day isn't considered an especially important holiday to most, it does create a three-day weekend and this year it is coupled with a Friday Valentine's Day to kick it off. Undoubtedly, the prompting of cupid's arrow and with love in their eyes couples will likely go out to a restaurant to dine and those couples will probably consume a glass or two of wine or champagne. This leads to the decision as to whether or not the driver should make that decision to operate a motor vehicle after those couple of glasses of their favorite libation.
I know most persons will make an intelligent decision and not drive if they feel impaired but this scenario presents a precarious proposition. Alliteration aside (ha ha) many will face a situation in which they feel that after a couple of glasses of wine it is fine to drive, and guess what, the legislature of every state in the nation agrees with you! This is precisely why you see .08 plastered on signs all around our communities because it is legal to drink and drive. Yes I said it, it is legal to drink and drive. In Washington State, it is illegal to have an alcohol concentration above .08 within two hours of driving or to be under the influence of or affected by what you have consumed. That second phrase is where decisions to drive become more tricky.
What DUI attorneys commonly refer to as the "affected by" prong of the DUI statute (RCW 46.61.502) creates a very subjective situation for officers. Picture this, if you have had those two glasses of wine, beer, whatever and are stopped and actually admit to drinking you will, in all likelihood, be asked to participate in field sobriety testing and if you decline will most certainly be arrested. Then think further, you are arrested are anxious, nervous and upset and now the officer wants you to take a breath test! Oh my good Lord, what do I do, I mean I don't feel impaired or over the .08 threshold but don't know what to do. Let's say you are advised to refuse, now you are in a situation wherein the officer is going to elaborate in his or her report regarding the observations they made with respect to their contact with you and those observations will certainly include bloodshot, watery eyes, a flushed face, dexterity problems, maybe some balance issues and for sure slurred speech. What, slurred speech! But I only had two drinks! I know, I know, but the officer will testify at a subsequent trial, "they all say two but in my opinion she/he was impaired by alcohol"!!! This scenario presents itself time and again and people are genuinely shocked that the police report alleges observations not consistent with reality. Why, because the officer knows you had at least two (hell you admitted as much) and that they don't have any other objective evidence to support their decision to arrest, so they must elaborate. Now I'm not saying every officer is going to just make up outright lies, but you can bet your bottom dollar there will be "observations" they made which you, the now defendant, dispute. Why? Because no matter what the legislature says law enforcement agencies have an unwritten rule that drinking and driving is a no-tolerance offense.
Well, crap, what should I do you say? The easiest and best decision in this day and age is to take a cab or don't drive after drinking anything. I don't necessarily think there is anything wrong with drinking a beer and driving home and neither does the state legislature, but if an officer doesn't get what they want on the side of the road when they ask, despite all of it being voluntary, you are going to find yourself charged with a DUI! So again, just take a cab or don't drink at dinner, just wait to have some champagne at home, trust me you will be in no mood for Valentine's activities with your partner if you just bailed out!
___________________________________________________________________
I know most persons will make an intelligent decision and not drive if they feel impaired but this scenario presents a precarious proposition. Alliteration aside (ha ha) many will face a situation in which they feel that after a couple of glasses of wine it is fine to drive, and guess what, the legislature of every state in the nation agrees with you! This is precisely why you see .08 plastered on signs all around our communities because it is legal to drink and drive. Yes I said it, it is legal to drink and drive. In Washington State, it is illegal to have an alcohol concentration above .08 within two hours of driving or to be under the influence of or affected by what you have consumed. That second phrase is where decisions to drive become more tricky.
What DUI attorneys commonly refer to as the "affected by" prong of the DUI statute (RCW 46.61.502) creates a very subjective situation for officers. Picture this, if you have had those two glasses of wine, beer, whatever and are stopped and actually admit to drinking you will, in all likelihood, be asked to participate in field sobriety testing and if you decline will most certainly be arrested. Then think further, you are arrested are anxious, nervous and upset and now the officer wants you to take a breath test! Oh my good Lord, what do I do, I mean I don't feel impaired or over the .08 threshold but don't know what to do. Let's say you are advised to refuse, now you are in a situation wherein the officer is going to elaborate in his or her report regarding the observations they made with respect to their contact with you and those observations will certainly include bloodshot, watery eyes, a flushed face, dexterity problems, maybe some balance issues and for sure slurred speech. What, slurred speech! But I only had two drinks! I know, I know, but the officer will testify at a subsequent trial, "they all say two but in my opinion she/he was impaired by alcohol"!!! This scenario presents itself time and again and people are genuinely shocked that the police report alleges observations not consistent with reality. Why, because the officer knows you had at least two (hell you admitted as much) and that they don't have any other objective evidence to support their decision to arrest, so they must elaborate. Now I'm not saying every officer is going to just make up outright lies, but you can bet your bottom dollar there will be "observations" they made which you, the now defendant, dispute. Why? Because no matter what the legislature says law enforcement agencies have an unwritten rule that drinking and driving is a no-tolerance offense.
Well, crap, what should I do you say? The easiest and best decision in this day and age is to take a cab or don't drive after drinking anything. I don't necessarily think there is anything wrong with drinking a beer and driving home and neither does the state legislature, but if an officer doesn't get what they want on the side of the road when they ask, despite all of it being voluntary, you are going to find yourself charged with a DUI! So again, just take a cab or don't drink at dinner, just wait to have some champagne at home, trust me you will be in no mood for Valentine's activities with your partner if you just bailed out!
___________________________________________________________________
About the author:
Nathan Webb, is a seasoned Seattle DUI Lawyer. His practice of 10 years emphasizes DUI defense. He has been repeatedly recognized as one of Seattle's Best Attorneys! He was recognized as a Top Seattle DUI Attorneys by Seattle Met Magazine, Repeatedly named a Super Lawyer Rising Star in the area of DUI Defense by Washington Law and Politics Magazine, and is Rated Superb for DUI Defense (perfect 10.0 out of 10.0) by Avvo.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)